Yep, I’m back at it again. I’ve observed some more political discourse and there have been a few terms that have lodged themselves into my brain that I simply cannot ignore anymore. In the long-standing spirit of this blog, I’m going to simply shine a light on how these terms are actually used in common political discourse, and what the speaker actually means when these terms are used.
Will you guys get mad at me for saying the quiet part out loud rather than those who dog-whistle? Yep. Will I lose any sleep over it? Nope. Let’s begin…
Fascist: Target of Murder. That’s right, I fucking said it; sharpen your pitchforks all you want, but we all know it’s true. The recent assassination of Charlie Kirk is simply just one example of that. There was anti-fascist messaging carved into one of the bullet-casings, especially “hey fascist! CATCH!”. Let’s not also forget that our current President, a survivor of multiple assassination attempts, is also routinely called a fascist. Liberals had spent years denouncing Donald Trump as a fascist. Coincidence between this dog-whistling and the assassination attempts? I think not…
Essentially, when somebody says that [Insert name here} is a fascist, what they are actually saying is that [Insert name here] is a target for murder. Keep this in mind next time you see somebody with a high-profile such as a notable political or social figure use that framing. Make no mistake, the term fascist now is simply a subtle signal that orders political violence from their followers while maintaining plausible deniability.
Restorative Justice: Soft on crime. This is predominately aimed at judges in deep-blue states that often support policies such as lighter sentencing, no-cash bail, immediate release for anti-social crimes, and so-on, even if the perpetrators have lengthy arrest records.
See, judges get mad if you call them woke or soft on crime. And when judges feel that you’ve insulted them, whether in the court room or on social media, they are quick to drop the hammer on those who dare to speak out, However, judges in deep blue states absolutely adore being called restorative. This is doubly true if the perp is from a non-white racial background; so much for justice being blind.
These are the judges that are likely to sentence criminals to therapy and otherwise dubious, precedent-breaking sentences for anti-social behavior. This is often done under the guise of prison isn’t effective. While the efficacy of our modern prison system is absolutely a conversation worth having, the fact that Oregon has just re-criminalized drug use is an example that being soft on criminals perhaps isn’t a good idea. Hell, even hyper-liberal CNN even posted an hour-long episode of “The Whole Story with Anderson Cooper” regarding San Francisco’s rampant crime problem.
Judges also seem to hate it when they are accused of being political activists from the bench, even if that is what is blatantly happening. However, calling a judge restorative is a consequence-free method of calling out a judge for allowing lawlessness to run the streets.
The truth cannot be unseen…
Home Page 