PassportBros; it’s an on-again, off-again social media trend that comes up with recurring frequency. American men venture overseas to find a wife and start a new life with their foreign bride. Sounds great, right? Wrong! There’s no shortage of American women crashing out over the rise in men going abroad to find love. But nobody stops to ask Why? The answer is simple. American women absolutely care about this trend because it’s a sign of a deep-rooted insecurity. This trend is essentially what The Great Replacement would look like if it disproportionately impacted women instead of men.
So, let’s stress-test the idea. I’ll introduce a policy idea that would put our nation’s Becky’s on notice. Typically, I don’t condone government intervention. With that said, there’s a gap between Planet Dan and what society has historically accepted. Thus, I’m going to recommend ideas and reasons outside of my normal hands-off approach. Like many of my overhaul ideas, the idea wouldn’t require any new technologies to be invented and it relies on infrastructure we already have and employees currently on the payroll. In other words, we could implement this stress-test tomorrow if Washington truly wanted to…
The GFR
My idea is to create a new visa class called the GFR: short for Great Female Replacement. Unmarried women between the ages of 18-30 years old traveling alone to the United States from non-Schengen Europe (including Russia), East/Southeast Asia, and Latin America would be the only ones eligible for GFR visas. These visas will be issued on arrival to the United States following the successful completion of a mandatory three-day stay at an immigration processing center.
During this time at the holding facility, GFR candidates will be measured and weighed. To obtain a GFR visa, the candidate must have a negative STD panel and pregnancy test. Furthermore, she must have a BMI below 25. Proof of identification and unmarried status will be mandatory as well. Assuming these criteria are met, then the candidate is granted a GFR visa and allowed entry into the United States for one year; though this can be extended if she meets certain conditions.
The GFR visa-holder will be eligible for temporary housing allowances if she is willing to be bussed out to/ live in areas of most societal need. What areas are these, you ask? Simple; areas with a high number of unmarried men under the age of 45 relative to mid-20th century norms (though reasonable minds can disagree on the exact metric used). Why historical norms? Simple; it serves as a benchmark of a time of a sustainable population. With that said, this is the furthest extent of taxpayer support that she can expect while in the country on a GFR visa.
The GFR recipient will not be allowed to work more than 30 hours per week while on the GFR visa. She will also be barred from attending any university or community college. She will also not be allowed to visit any sperm bank while on a GFR visa. Abortions will not be allowed for GFR visa-holders with two exceptions; if her life is in immediate danger, or the baby’s father is not an American citizen. Access to birth control will also be restricted heavily; only an approval signature from an American man will suffice.
The GFR can extend her visa by one of three methods. First, she can marry a man who is an American citizen. This will extend her stay for 15-20 years. Secondly, she gives birth to a baby whose father is an American citizen. This will also extend her stay by 15-20 years. Thirdly, she can cohabitate with an American man; a signed lease and confirmation with the landlord will suffice. This will only extend her stay for 2 years. Should the GFR visa-holder fail to marry an American man, cohabitate with one, or have an American man’s baby within a year of her arrival, then her visa expires. Once that happens, she must either self-deport or expect a not-so-pleasant visit from ICE.
I normally dislike market caps, but one is crucial. An American man would only be allowed to marry or cohabitate with one GFR visa-holder at a time. The point of this is to prevent mate-hoarding. It wouldn’t be a Great Female Replacement if wide swaths of American men remain locked out of the market. Market incentives do need to be maintained, after all. To quote Nick Pell “I guess that makes me a bad libertarian, but hey, find me a good one.”
The pathway to citizenship can be shortened upon the birth of her third baby from an American citizen. This would reduce her time-served requirement down to eight years. Let’s incentivize population sustainability! However, if she breaks her cohabitation from an American man, or divorces her American husband prior to the 15 year requirement, then she’d forfeit the right to claim alimony or child support in court. She’d also endanger her immigration status and becomes prone to deportation. The only exception to the deportation would be if the American man is convicted of marital rape or domestic violence.
Only upon receiving full citizenship can she begin the process of chain migration to the United States. However, given her entry into the US as a former GFR, these cases will be buried in intentional bureaucracy and red tape. The chain-migration candidates will be evaluated on their own merits as to how they’ll positively impact the United States. After all, let’s not forget that she came here as a low-skill immigrant that needed financial assistance. We need to be strategic about who enters the nation.
The Quiet Part Out Loud
Yes, traveling alone is mandatory. The point isn’t to allow her to bring her family along, it’s to incentivize her to start a new one in America. An American family. Yes, with an American man. Allowing her to bring any previous children or a boyfriend from her previous country flies in the face of that goal.
As for entry requirements, the BMI scale was quite intentional. It was chosen specifically to apply market pressure on American women. Being suddenly swamped with foreigners outcompeting you in the market is a feeling that American women simply aren’t used to. They’ve never had to fear being ethnically replaced in the way that men have. This is also why transportation to and housing assistance inn exchange for sending her to bachelor-heavy locales is needed; it is the greatest societal need (well, from the men’s perspective anyways).
The one-year time limit and limited financial assistance are features, not bugs. She isn’t here to get comfortable, become a cat lady and grow old as a spinster. Nope, that doesn’t apply market pressure to the American women that she’s here to ethnically replace. If she has any interest in staying in the United States, then she better get out of the goddamn house frequently. Who knows, she might even start approaching American men; talk about a major competitive advantage against her complacent US-born competitors!
The 30 hour-per-week work restriction is also an intentional choice. She isn’t being imported to serve as a corporate drone. She’s here to prioritize finding an American man. Also, the work-hours cap is designed to encourage her to form a partnership with an American man for her economic security.
Similar to the work requirement, the educational restriction is necessary. After all, she isn’t here to cure cancer or get politically radicalized. She’s here to find an American man and have his babies, full stop. College would simply be a distraction from this goal, doubly so since the American campus is a difficult place to find men anyways. Her not having educational debt would honestly be a major competitive advantage in the relationship over the American females that she’s here to ethnically replace.
The abortion and contraception restrictions are also intentional choices. She isn’t here to stay in her ethnic comfort zone and fuck other immigrants. She’s here to find and fuck Americans. This restriction is essential because foreign women forming relationships/having sex with American men applies market pressure on American women. IF immigrant women simply come here to fuck immigrant men, then American women won’t actually fear being ethnically replaced.
The prohibition on GFR’s visiting sperm banks is by design. The requirement of have babies from an American man could hypothetically be circumvented by a few trips to the sperm bank. The intent is for her to have sex with American men. Thus, the sperm bank option needs to be removed from the table. Have I mentioned that she’s here to ethnically replace the standard American female?
The steep penalties on the imported women for prematurely divorcing/breaking cohabitation aren’t an accident. The economic neutering of these post-breakup GFR’s would serve as a deterrent against ending relationships for frivolous reasons. Again, this applies market pressure on American women. Who would’ve thought that migrants would endure conditions that Americans wouldn’t?
Eventual Reaction
“Dan!” Karen shrieks “This is awfully similar to your K1 visa article!” That is pretty observant of you. With that said, there is one key difference this time around. The K1 visa still inherently relies on the American man venturing out of the country to meet the woman in a foreign land. In a way, that is simply an individual opting out. Individuals opting out of a broken system does not foster widespread cultural change.
This idea is different because it flips the paradigm on its head. This time, the American men can sit back and wait for the properly-incentivized women to come into their neighborhoods. Dry markets would become fertile grounds virtually overnight.
Best case scenario; American liberal women practice what they preach and celebrate the mass-migration of a demographic that is brought here to specifically drive them out of their native market. This is because the American liberal, especially the liberal woman would logically realize that they cannot possibly have their cake and eat it too, and that reversing course would be hypocritical. Hence, the replacee’s celebrate (or at least silently tolerate), the arrival of their replacements. Excuse me for a second. After all, if we learned anything in the Summer of 2020, it’s that silence is complicity, amirite? Lack of a protest means proceed with the plan as far as I’m concerned…
Worst case scenario; American women get indignantly mad and start absolutely flipping the fuck out. It would honestly turn into Charlottesville 2017 except with blonde highlights instead of shaved heads. The angry reaction would of course prove the point that the Great Replacement exists and is actively happening. Only this time, it would be happening to the median American female sexually rather than the median American male economically.
It’s Charlottesville for Starbucks and Yoga Pants…
Home Page 